Elliott Hird on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:13:00 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] !



On 22 Jan 2009, at 17:02, Geoffrey Spear wrote:

There's been some discussion in Agora of the concept of "simultaneous
but ordered", but I don't really think it matters whether past
Decisions are destroyed (those not submitted in the same message as
another would seem to not be) or are floating around as Historical
forever, unless you're worried about platonic gamestate memory usage.
I don't think we need to Tweak garbage collection.

A finite, enumerable set of objects would be nice.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss