Re: [s-d] [s-b] I Want It Back Oh Yeah

[Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Replace all rules fails, as rules excludes the anti-memetic one.

On 21/01/2009, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Elliott Hird <
> penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 20 Jan 2009, at 19:58, Elliott Hird wrote:
>>
>>  I amend this proposal to read:
>>> {{
>>> Create a rule titled "Not a Rule" in the category Monsters, Beasts,
>>> Poltergeists and Ghouls reading:
>>> {
>>> This rule cannot be referenced outside of itself in any way, directly or
>>> indirectly (e.g., if the rules as a whole are referenced, this rule is
>>> not
>>> included). Any such references are meaningless and void.
>>>
>>> This rule takes precedence over every other rule.
>>> }
>>> }}
>>>
>>
>> I amend this proposal to read:
>> {{
>> Append to rule 5E47 (Victory):
>> {
>> === Win by Indirection ===
>>
>> Trigger: A player becomes the originator of an occurrence that causes the
>> rule titled "Not a Rule" to be repealed, and this repealing was not done
>> by
>> a Refresh Proposal, where originator is defined as the submitter of the
>> proposal/tweak that repealed it, or the performer of the action that
>> repealed it, etc. Further determination of the originator is left to the
>> Consultation system.
>>
>> Victors: The player referred to as the originator in the Trigger.
>>
>> Prize: SCP-055, as described at http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-055
>>
>> Cleanup: This Victory Condition is repealed.
>>
>> }
>>
>> Create a rule titled "Not a Rule" in the category Monsters, Beasts,
>> Poltergeists and Ghouls reading:
>> {
>> This rule cannot be referenced outside of itself in any way, directly or
>> indirectly (e.g., if the rules as a whole are referenced, this rule is not
>> included). Any such references are meaningless and void.
>>
>> This rule takes precedence over every other rule.
>> }
>> }}
>>
>
> I quite like the idea of having a victory condition like this. Perhaps to
> make it tougher, this rule should also specify that it can't be repealed,
> destroyed, etc. Can't cease to exist or to be part of the ruleset.
>
> Otherwise the easy way to get rid of it would be to submit an entire ruleset
> (e.g. like Make it Better but not as an RP). Also, RPs might become extinct
> and replaced by PoOs depending on this nweek's voting.
>
> BP
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss