Re: [s-d] [s-b] oh come on

Geoffrey Spear on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:41:15 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] oh come on

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] oh come on
From: "Geoffrey Spear" <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:40:58 -0500
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650901201518r84ccdc5r241a23a2452125e9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <03B2B9F8-170C-45F3-B9B3-51F326F6BE18@xxxxxxxxx> <49761253.6080005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901201518r84ccdc5r241a23a2452125e9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, this line of reasoning is just plain silly.

You're missing the fact that some players insist on interpreting the
rules in the way that means they're the most broken, even if this
interpretation isn't at all reasonable.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] oh come on
  - From: 0x44

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] oh come on
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] oh come on
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Excuse Me?!
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] oh come on
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] oh come on
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] oh come on
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread