Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:19:03 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] oh come on |
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:05 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Elliott Hird wrote: > >> 17:47 < _0x44> Points of Order are not Game Documents, they are game >> documents. >> >> Consultation: {game documents are distinct from Game Documents} >> Arguments: No, just no. >> > Argument: If post-Proposal 0585 Rule 0 game documents are Game Documents, > and Rule 0 explicitly claims precedence over all other Rules, Rule 5e7 > cannot define Game Documents. So, either game documents are distinct from > Game Documents, or Proposal 0585 destroys all Rules. Unless I'm missing something, this line of reasoning is just plain silly. Let's evaluate 585 on its own (other merits). Post-585 Rule 0 would specify that PoOs are g(G)ame d(D)ocuments. This does not constitute an exclusive definition that would prevent the lower-precedence Rule 7 from defining Game Documents! "any number of Points of Order which are game documents detailing a single change to the Rules or Game State of B." If one Rule says that Socrates is a man, and another says that a man is defined as an adult male human (add any gender theory variation to this definition that you want...), this does not constitute a CONFLICT between these two rules. Therefore, there is no issue of precedence. Saying that Socrates is a man in no way excludes other entities from being men. So the big g little g issue is inconsequential except with regard to some characteristics of PoOs that might be regulated by Rule 7. Note that I think it would be a better idea to keep Rule 0 modular and independent of definitions in other Rules, i.e. not to call PoOs Game Documents (in the Rule 7 sense, which to me encompasses game documents (uncapitalized)). That would prevent a break in Rule 7 from ruining Rule 0. THAT might make me vote against 585, not a fear of Rule 0 ruining the others. BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss