Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Two-tier precedence

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

James Baxter wrote:

> Personally, I don't see what's wrong with the existing precedence system - it allows more complex relationships between rules but these can easily be worked out with some thinking (and possibly a consultation...).

Actually, B might be a good place to try some things that Agora never
(AFAIK) picked up, e.g. "A player can specify exactly two rules and
spend <number> macks to reverse their normal precedence for the purpose
of the next action e performs", or hasn't used for years, e.g. "If all
the rules explicitly defer to a different method of resolving precedence
then that method is used" (for subsets of the rules that work like
playing cards or something; here, it might be used for multi-colored
areas of the Grid).

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss