| Jamie Dallaire on Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:41:48 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Time Jump |
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:07 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > > Billy Pilgrim wrote: > > > > > That said, the question of whether nweeks 153 and 154 had an end or a > > > beginning is a very good one! That might change things like: > > > > nweek 153 ended and nweek 154 began (per ordinary-language definitions, > > which I don't think the rules attempt to override) when the relevant > > Tweak was activated. > > The rules do define the beginning of an nweek, but it has the same > meaning as the common-sense one you posted above. Personally agree with Murphy about the common-sense end of an nweek too, but we all know how some people are about ordinary language... BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss