Re: [s-d] Time Jump

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:07 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Billy Pilgrim wrote:
> 
> > That said, the question of whether nweeks 153 and 154 had an end or a
> > beginning is a very good one! That might change things like:
> 
> nweek 153 ended and nweek 154 began (per ordinary-language definitions,
> which I don't think the rules attempt to override) when the relevant
> Tweak was activated.

The rules do define the beginning of an nweek, but it has the same
meaning as the common-sense one you posted above.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss