Re: [s-d] Time Jump

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Things which occur at the start of the nweek would still happen as we are now in another nweek, therefore the nweek must have started. Actions at the start of an nweek are not attached to specific ndays.
 
> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:18:37 +0000
> From: bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-d] Time Jump
> 
> 
> > 
> > Rule 5E10 says "require or force" which means the same as "permit or
> > cause".
> > 
> > Was there a beginning of nweek 154 or an end of nweek 153?
> 
> Even if the retro-activity clause of 5e10 came into consideration, it
> wouldn't matter because the ndays on which the actions were set to occur
> did not happen.
> 
_________________________________________________________________
Cut through the jargon: find a PC for your needs.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/130777504/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss