Re: [s-d] Time Jump

bnomic on Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:18:42 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Time Jump

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Time Jump
From: <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:18:37 +0000
In-reply-to: <BAY126-W46DB5507946D0065C22C9785D40@xxxxxxx>
References: <BAY126-W41CF029BE5165AD9E88F3185D40@xxxxxxx> <4a3ec55978b3d89e6cb1c7f33ab463b8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W46DB5507946D0065C22C9785D40@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: RoundCube Webmail

>  
> Rule 5E10 says "require or force" which means the same as "permit or
> cause".
>  
> Was there a beginning of nweek 154 or an end of nweek 153?

Even if the retro-activity clause of 5e10 came into consideration, it
wouldn't matter because the ndays on which the actions were set to occur
did not happen.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] Time Jump
  - From: James Baxter

References:
- [s-d] Time Jump
  - From: James Baxter
- Re: [s-d] Time Jump
  - From: bnomic
- Re: [s-d] Time Jump
  - From: James Baxter

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's not do the time warp again, please
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Time Jump
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Time Jump
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Time Jump
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread