Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

Actually, I checked. The section on Consultations has a paragraph that says,
"Whenever there exists a Waiting Consultation which has no priest assigned,
the Oracle is obligated to either assign a priest to that Consultation or
ZOT it."

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I ZOT the below-quoted Consultation. I also ZOT Consultation 178, which I
> > recently noticed was also on that question. It had gone unanswered, btw.
>
>
> Concerning 178, I'm pretty sure the Rules don't allow you to ZOT a
> Consultation that has gone unanswered AFTER being assigned to a Priest.
>
> You can only ZOT it if:
> a) it has never been assigned to a Priest
> or
> b) the most recently assigned Priest requests that it be ZOTTED.
>
> BP
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss