Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!

Jamie Dallaire on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 00:37:02 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 02:36:57 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=8uN4bz3i9/YG1o0zUhMnJ39TtFqk8wBU+BSlPS6tLeQ=; b=x8xjcIfbYoUSZHxg1LV6qXMGXriE5rj3hrEnpRkNkfGTUQCVE3X16Cx4hq5VZAcWRs GZom3Zb4tNifYpxxORAGUcEmy5pSol2bO49KuNGyE6G8RgTejMXVaNcxVzC9Qsi21GSs ip2FXR8zHcPR3w7bMeU7sgFZaryxJ69DoUSHo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=rLbdMc88dtGgCss5F97gE6DaKmwhArLcvZCg6dUqmZIEEgsXA75erks83Kyj1O214f FaLah9eucUG1IvsfQrnLVsAounoUdfCBYrH6SVvu8PLtDMk7Uf4FNtmO71f+ZDcrSfRT Gg37nOfflKQwSxQs3zALgHbpGlQslDktHzppU=
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0901061317q6b9119nf3876d53622012f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <0c2fa627174a1751a423b042d33f501c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <496267BA.7020607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4809bc7bfe5bc4407527d4fe9a6f7a12@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W17E7A2AFDF15A8D7A242F385E10@xxxxxxx> <1f17421390e6565f8029b31cd939080d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20901051221l5f0a802ag20b0ae92dff651f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5c86b09f5001da73b6b2a5c1bd4cd0c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20901051228x74b47c8cr86a9197f72d419fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0901061252y38163602m9d2f3085d6891fd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0901061317q6b9119nf3876d53622012f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I ZOT the below-quoted Consultation. I also ZOT Consultation 178, which I
> recently noticed was also on that question. It had gone unanswered, btw.

Concerning 178, I'm pretty sure the Rules don't allow you to ZOT a
Consultation that has gone unanswered AFTER being assigned to a Priest.

You can only ZOT it if:
a) it has never been assigned to a Priest
or
b) the most recently assigned Priest requests that it be ZOTTED.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!
  - From: Tyler

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!
  - From: James Baxter
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!
  - From: bnomic
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!
  - From: bnomic
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Who's Ordained?
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread