|
comex on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:26:52 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Eliminate inappropriate plural pronouns
|
- To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Eliminate inappropriate plural pronouns
- From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:26:47 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=CceEp7JQO2n7EQEscihrgq9q6GFm8VT53hj241j5O7Y=; b=dMCqGzG3USw355eJ6WvBFcVyME78aVWkxEuvsk+lvm8RyZJeMZv3qr0QyKZgBzzPoA weOnlO850tD2Se9sylCijCRjceunS37FHx7jzxIPinZ7ig5EOtuDicPj+dRO8zP8dNa6 0SZIossPdGY84ES95hMVvQjfK48eY4VlaZJTI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=MaKsUZAQXBI7bRl51GGJ65EiZvt2WPOtIJ0pukIUWmb1TAOkislqo16jSOf7d/pz+O XTv2zhrk1npsCVHAIfeT4Bbxd4I8ev233wvDA3Ge0EpH+ZH7M7jUcC5d8K5LiIUPkWzz Ugl6jkmBVi7b+z2/4VcJVVmfaFgU/hZw1E85E=
- In-reply-to: <CBA864BE-6C5C-469A-96CC-EA243259EBFE@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4961BFE5.7080502@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <CBA864BE-6C5C-469A-96CC-EA243259EBFE@xxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can we have unambiguity without the sexism? (Spivak is not an option...)
That is to say, every single self-reference in the game has to be of
the following form?
subjective: he himself/she herself
possessive: his/her own
objective: himself/herself
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss