|
Elliott Hird on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:16:07 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Eliminate inappropriate plural pronouns
|
- To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Eliminate inappropriate plural pronouns
- From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:15:58 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; bh=s7e0k6n77iEp5vRQKSRAUn73QowHNkpf3REa4E1Neqo=; b=c1MOpNDTnPgNDQ37mqhlbFedLIjSsWUp0YPWo2KfJjdX12GTnxJ2TXgqxRrPGFDXj2 Io9osYOpigEo/30ToLA8VTPRLU7gjUqdB42MJFL+TP0Q7047h95TxL3dmN0nqrdDHjAU UuO/rpOke9iV7WY4IBMR1oCcVxMDfg5+mJInc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=W81cZIr/uXKyyKOcJB6bYMsGwKzv2j4KdDAWF/sMYf3W+y2JFj520OC31Gk7fGRGSP 4jBJXkd5Q85aTZvkSxd1x9yaoE+YmUJ1BKTcDVhSxS53m5fz2qSlBHuONirSvBBaM+GN B1lCKbEp+UwRze/95rV+aLFMPyPKB+MHm3Nxg=
- In-reply-to: <4961BFE5.7080502@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4961BFE5.7080502@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 5 Jan 2009, at 08:08, Ed Murphy wrote:
Proposal: Eliminate inappropriate plural pronouns
Can we have unambiguity without the sexism? (Spivak is not an option...)
also
A Game Object are said to be "in possession of" its Owner.
^ what
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss