Craig Daniel on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:04:25 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Temporally Displaced Forfeiture


On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Charles Schaefer
<chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2009/1/5, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Charles Schaefer
>> <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Someone else already said this, but: His attempt to forfeit then was
>> invalid
>> > since he was not a player. He has since joined the game.
>>
>> On the other hand, when e decided to forfeit then, e was a player. The
>> fact that you can forfeit at any time does not mean you can only
>> forfeit at times when you are a player, although it's only players who
>> can forfeit at any time.
>
>
> He was a player when he DECIDED to forfeit, but not when he ATTEMPTED
> to forfeit.

At the time that e sent the attempt to forfeit, e was a player. E
merely attempted to have the forfeiture happen at a different time,
which the rules seem to explicitly allow.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss