Craig Daniel on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:04:25 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Temporally Displaced Forfeiture |
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/1/5, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Charles Schaefer >> <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > Someone else already said this, but: His attempt to forfeit then was >> invalid >> > since he was not a player. He has since joined the game. >> >> On the other hand, when e decided to forfeit then, e was a player. The >> fact that you can forfeit at any time does not mean you can only >> forfeit at times when you are a player, although it's only players who >> can forfeit at any time. > > > He was a player when he DECIDED to forfeit, but not when he ATTEMPTED > to forfeit. At the time that e sent the attempt to forfeit, e was a player. E merely attempted to have the forfeiture happen at a different time, which the rules seem to explicitly allow. - teucer _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss