Tyler on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:17:49 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Who's Ordained? |
I try to make subject lines general enough that people can reply without being off topic. But other than that, it seems like a good idea. On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ehird wrote: > > > On 5 Jan 2009, at 15:31, Ed Murphy wrote: > > > >> Especially in light of assignments being declared invalid with > >> alarming > >> regularity, I politely request that the Oracle use subject lines along > >> the lines of "[Oracle] Consultation <number> assigned to <name>". > > > > BINA > > "BINA" IN "I can't be arsed to write a fully informative subject line". > > Part of this is probably B's culture of shuffling up the Ministries > (not to mention the rules) every nweek; habits don't have much > opportunity to form. > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss