| Charles Schaefer on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:11:27 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player? |
2009/1/4, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > On 4 Jan 2009, at 23:40, Charles Schaefer wrote: > > And like I said, I don't see what can deny anyone the >> right to stop playing. Even the rules cannot do this, except as a legal >> fiction. >> > > Yes, but legally, I am still a Player. Then my claim of inconsistency is irrelevant and it shouldn't bother you. From your own reasoning: 2009/1/2, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > WHAT IS THE RULES BASIS FROM THEM BEING DESTROYED? >> >> nothing! Nothing! >> >> This Consultation isn't even Influential! It doesn't make them so, it is >> merely FALSE! >> >> The rules do not say they are destroyed. They simply don't. And this >> consultation can't change that. >> >> You are all batshit insane and consistent-ing in a simply INCORRECT >> judgment. >> >> So my claims of inconsistency won't change your status as a player and >> consultations don't do a damn thing except put the Priest's opinion to a >> non-binding vote. >> > -- > w1n5t0n aka > Charles Schaefer _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss