|
Elliott Hird on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 08:48:55 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: ehird's macks
|
- To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: ehird's macks
- From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:48:44 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; bh=TtCOK95RBwD0XBcJA13f51svDs1gSFE1nIFyyg8gORc=; b=VR6LVPMCvmO8AC+kleTUm2m4rTydhdbGMZ8Eo4/BN4FVSeF+qCH/nvdsSEBTYscrWI wamT22cmKUlEz8AeayHI60bponXMeMRQmgnhlsMijw9F/BupOF7qtT/4OBjX47lTjor9 IK1il6ffeHivKhU4sf1fKulLIOdoL7UbRzbSg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=t5Bv1YoWyO23CrJ+EHCn9lKGbMl5QNuDdwYi1b6iuT36YB/z3SNtJo3E53YiYlXws/ qYEFNetDspOqkhw32+eWa5sLSqqc/DkRRMk8TkJVw7hnr0q2BNt2MBY1rVkulIN65Q5E frArgTbKXwuHSq/pfHuMG97ZJJ6bsdeCe6XCM=
- In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0901040237m2ed8867bu65e8f3c6a659da75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <55b258c20812310951p16aaea1dp20f2dadfb4933e0e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0901040237m2ed8867bu65e8f3c6a659da75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 4 Jan 2009, at 10:37, Tyler wrote:
As priest for this Consultation, (I hope I'm not too late,) I
Answer it
TRUE. Reasoning:
I agree with the judgment but not the reasoning. Nobody is just an
abstract
value defined by the rules. It could as well have been called Chewbacca.
In fact, it _should_ have been called Chewbacca.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss