Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:15:17 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0


On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 6:02 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Elliott Hird wrote:
>
>>
>> On 3 Jan 2009, at 21:24, 0x44 wrote:
>>
>>  Hm, s-n may be a Public Forum, but is not labeled so on the public
>>> display.
>>>
>>
>> Well, it is.
>>
> Unless the public display self-ratified without s-n being defined as a
> public forum.


self-ratification went out with the RP (actually a little before, in my
counter-scam on wooble's self-ratification scam) that define s-n as public.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss