Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0

0x44 on Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:13:05 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:12:54 -0600
In-reply-to: <495EAEC4.2040206@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <d0a47ec5a32ee67f5d73f1870351087c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <495EAEC4.2040206@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

Ed Murphy wrote:

0x44 wrote:

  3. The most recent Public Forum becomes the Emergency Forum. If for any


"most recent Public Forum" is /still/ ambiguous (though still simple
to work around).

How is the most recent Public Forum ambiguous?

--
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0
  - From: Alex Smith

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Temporally Displaced Forfeiture
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread