Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 10:50:57 -0800
> From: bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
> 
> 
> > Whether they're destroyed or not, there definitely is a rules basis for
> > them no longer being owned by you if they exist.
> > 
>
> 5E2 "All Ownable Game Objects have an Owner, which is either a Legal 
> Entity or Nobody. Game Objects are said to be "in possession of" their 
> Owner."
> 
> 5E29 "Only Legal Entities can own mackerel."
> 
> To "own" an object is not defined in the rules. If it were, only Legal 
> Entities could do it to mackeral.
> 
> Macks are, however, "in the possession of" either a Legal Entity or Nobody.
> 
> Since the Legal Entity ehird does not exist, the macks must be "in the 
> possession of" Nobody, although this does not mean that Nobody "owns" 
> the macks.
> 
> CONSISTENT.
> 
 
Rule 5E44: "Players and Colours are Legal Entities.
 
Nobody is therefore not a Legal Entity and cannot be in possesion of mackerel.
_________________________________________________________________
 Live Search presents Big Snap II - win John Lewis vouchers 
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/117442309/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss