Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

Craig Daniel on Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:56:35 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:56:29 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=jkPe5rLHJqre6M7LZuxvZ2lwlotAgO6xMpNQdNulvj4=; b=LEGHJ80V2HIiTdhvJ5qm450DO7klOW3w8RBPeHwMSwlGeq8Tb18yvm9It3YguY4Qn0 cLCQ/9XdXTPWKtG/la04bGhuEGKgqw8nFuKJXIfDWconTX2sVkLxmqa6itI0Fj8i1gfr axOkZv7FH8y0/Zuf5noDpjgbSpiLNoWR8lDNE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=vNDA654l5XnIOq8VdweeIB25ZQCdxZ+xuPIa+f0cyBkgy5qLV8jC6HO58K4OW1yrmZ FSHHhQcxl5DyaEsk4+1S8vHkAWHFcvvjc9Xz5qkkTennCrul2Z07m/5iTGSdhhKG3pOg tytwiAdtQHl0h5QGsXVTf7G63irgHyrMGh08U=
In-reply-to: <495E4547.5060207@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20812311526y2983f8a8i69bff80bca335064@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812311609i557c3f34tc2acaf732884cfa5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W560CA0E82079E6CFDCAFD785E20@xxxxxxx> <1F137F6B-5E5D-4930-840C-57318EB5B910@xxxxxxxxx> <495E4547.5060207@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Are you equally Tired And Emotional about the related theory that they
> cease to be Game Objects?  (See my previous "one of these three things
> probably happened to ehird's mack" message.)

I for one find all of those implausible. *Something* must have
happened, but there's nothing I believe could be the correct answer.

(Hence, I think both Consultations need to be judged as if the
deregistration changed nothing. MMQ's trying to argue for Paradox, but
I think there's no specific fate for the macks that could have
happened and thus no paradox on the Consultations as I called them.)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Exceptio Probat Regulam
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread