Elliott Hird on Fri, 2 Jan 2009 08:58:59 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187



On 2 Jan 2009, at 15:42, James Baxter wrote:

The Rules do not state that they are destroyed but I think that it is right that since they are not being owned by a Legal Entity (which they must be) they cannot exist and must be destroyed.

Must be destroyed? Where? Where? Where is this in the rules?

I don't see why it matter as rejoining will create a new player with m100 and the old macks will never be seen again.

The properties can be Consulted on -- I believe some are paradoxical.

Preists are allowed to make rulings like "A Player's mack are destroyed when they Forfeit" and this consultation will be made influential by default when it has been pondered.

Great! Now we have Agora: "let the oldbies snidely reference consultations of years ago because
god forbid the rules of the game be contained in the rules".
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss