| Charles Schaefer on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:30:31 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Oracle? |
2008/12/31, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:14 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >wrote: > > > > > We haven't seen much of the oracle lately and there are lots of > unassigned > > consultations so: > > > > I intend, with more support than objection, to cause the post of Minster > of > > Questions, also known as the Oracle, to become vacant. > > > There was a silly emergency going on, it was uncertain whether we were even > players, and because gametime was stopped nothing could be pondered > anyway.... > > Warrigal was doing a good job on MoQ before this brouhaha started, arranged > the PD nicely (I think it hadn't changed format in just about forever > before > that), so I say give him a chance. > > BP Agree. BobTHJ oh wait, I mean w1n5t0n (this multiple players scheme gets confusing sometimes) PS: Relax, I'm kidding. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss