Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah

[comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What's worrying here is that there's no real recourse for if the
> requirement isn't met later (but is at the time). As far as I can tell,
> the EF stays the same, the Pause keeps incrementing as normal, and the
> emergency never finishes if nobody can access the EF at all (in which
> case, we start a recursive Emergency). In a case like this where some
> people can access the EF but not others, then as far as I can tell the
> people who can access the EF are the only ones who can propose and vote.

So we start a sub-Emergency.  What's the problem?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss