| Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:46:39 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah |
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:10 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > And the Emergency Forum ais523 set up was accessible at the time of its > > designation. That was on step 3 of Rule 5E0, specifically fulfilling > > "Posting about the Emergency Forum on all official discussion and public > > fora is considered a sufficient effort. ". We're currently on step 5. > > Rule 5E0 says: "The Emergency Forum must be reasonably accessible to all > PEPs." > > There is no indication that this requirement stops being in effect > when the emergency process changes to a different step. Indeed. What would happen if, say, spoon-business had been designated as the EF in an unquestionably legitimate manner, then crashed while the Pause was 4? We need to add in a provision for changing the EF along the way (only if required, of course), methinks. BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss