Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "

Charles Schaefer on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:58:51 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
From: "Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:58:44 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=fMj34wSPyBb/7EYJr1B82010/i2S/jMAeROjNinpMEk=; b=RxQCpNH1jQkC7S9qm/+GyHK2L/vArm4c0LQ0GR4kvSpOSZGOLRYoOvZHLiubxKIk94 F/68hJA4q09sOWOXvWfZl/9sBbr/JLbCGH0GLgDxjg52pr3lAlbQG2iY02OWgq8JbfV2 FbD1TTy3LsvHpzOTAlRD8qzcFRSGOJs95AUi0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=R502E58ufcB+80PxleOYCsrDEsu08R4Q7DgwFyqHvnlVxdKKMrZgsYG4ml1r0815QU /PK0fTULxIk5n2tcWulrQNd4ultZGFr7O3RLMnD3Txa0/xA1f9imHKAFPQFVWN71rL6d UbTgZYXz1/FzoLCTkKM3fwyY/X/ZpaEiiWh7Y=
In-reply-to: <1229975394.8167.40.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <285c99840812221138j2fab199bhe6a78ee16dfa3097@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1229974801.8167.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812221145j39efeb69l7f63a67585b2719b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1229975394.8167.40.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2008/12/22, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> My nomination was deliberately to a-b, though


I don't think so.

-- 
> w1n5t0n aka
> Charles Schaefer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
  - From: Alex Smith

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
  - From: Charles Schaefer
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
  - From: Alex Smith

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread