Alex Smith on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:50:08 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset |
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 11:45 -0800, Charles Schaefer wrote: > 2008/12/22, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 11:38 -0800, Charles Schaefer wrote: > > > The (fifth > > > era) rules just say that Ministries are game objects, not necessarily > > ones > > > individually defined by the rules, however I think it is reasonable to > > make > > > that conclusion (based on fourth era precedent as well as the explicit > > legal > > > definition of all other current ministries). > > I nominate w1n5t0n for the Ministry of Nonexistence. > > -- > > > Someone (BP?) once suggested a Ministry of Chocolate. > I think maybe we need to split up ministerial elections from proposal > voting. Perhaps we could create a Ministry of Hope? (as in "I hope these > people I'm voting for won't mess up their jobs") > My nomination was deliberately to a-b, though. I'm wondering if it succeeded in creating a ministry, or possibly if the ministry always existed. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss