Alex Smith on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:50:08 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset


On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 11:45 -0800, Charles Schaefer wrote:
> 2008/12/22, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 11:38 -0800, Charles Schaefer wrote:
> > > The (fifth
> > > era) rules just say that Ministries are game objects, not necessarily
> > ones
> > > individually defined by the rules, however I think it is reasonable to
> > make
> > > that conclusion (based on fourth era precedent as well as the explicit
> > legal
> > > definition of all other current ministries).
> > I nominate w1n5t0n for the Ministry of Nonexistence.
> > --
> 
> 
> Someone (BP?) once suggested a Ministry of Chocolate.
> I think maybe we need to split up ministerial elections from proposal
> voting. Perhaps we could create a Ministry of Hope? (as in "I hope these
> people I'm voting for won't mess up their jobs")
> 
My nomination was deliberately to a-b, though. I'm wondering if it
succeeded in creating a ministry, or possibly if the ministry always
existed.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss