Charles Schaefer on Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:45:42 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Edit consultation... |
2008/12/19, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Fine; but I don't think it warrants a punishment unless people started > compulsively buying the item or something because of my telepathic > powers. 2008/12/19, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>: > > I claim the Answer to be Inconsistent, however, as per ehird's reasoning. > Also, because there is no Rule 58, as Charles pointed out. I wouldn't have > been outright opposed to a judgment of yes on rule 38 violation (even tho > it's a frivolous offense) but it definitely doesn't merit punishment (which > doesn't necessarily need to be assigned in all cases). The fine is just intended to get people to pause a minute before clicking the send button, something everyone (including the Priest) should remember. It's not anything against ehird specifically. -- > Charles Schaefer _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss