Charles Schaefer on Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:45:42 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Edit consultation...


2008/12/19, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Fine; but I don't think it warrants a punishment unless people started
> compulsively buying the item or something because of my telepathic
> powers.


2008/12/19, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> I claim the Answer to be Inconsistent, however, as per ehird's reasoning.
> Also, because there is no Rule 58, as Charles pointed out. I wouldn't have
> been outright opposed to a judgment of yes on rule 38 violation (even tho
> it's a frivolous offense) but it definitely doesn't merit punishment (which
> doesn't necessarily need to be assigned in all cases).


The fine is just intended to get people to pause a minute before clicking
the send button, something everyone (including the Priest) should remember.
It's not anything against ehird specifically.

-- 
> Charles Schaefer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss