Re: [s-d] [s-b] Edit consultation...

["Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>]

2008/12/19, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On 19 Dec 2008, at 21:29, Charles Schaefer wrote:
>
> Answer: YES. As punishment, I assign a nominal FINE of m10 in the hope that
>> it will both discourage (even accidental) spamming and encourage people to
>> use a little more caution when sending out emails.
>>
>
> INCONSISTENT.
>
> Our definition of spam is to discourage spam scams of walls of text; not
> accidental mail of links to websites that happen to be commercial in
> nature.


The "accidental" part is also covered by "use a little more caution." It's
no big deal really, I tried to set the fine low enough it wouldn't hurt.

-- 
> Charles Schaefer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss