Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 170

Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:43:34 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 170

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 170
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:43:28 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=9z/xhfANIauqODYrIwY+r7TiYGBKMxDI73lC+DDCzeg=; b=JW5oelby3qB7tlbKAchpgOg8K1Zd6yIzLVSiTJhmwD2SdU+pZpOKOdeH+VTqDLwNGC vQHMR/E8Dhm/DG/U+ON5eYo1uB3UMxkHBrPJNaCTTchSucWo05PuLYsqsO3EcTWTo0sa abSHL51hZZhHXmD6Jz/me/1R5qUKvdu331xoY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=bVMpSbX/ca7k87JT9UNWW2a6rNL0A6+o2WIy23ruyB6mAlUget3IagJbqNN76NpEJJ 3/5vqIr0YBjIKulYVBpnI93cK7DV9NZ3uOBPiOYWRV6lih0k9swW2NTpOUWzsVqFFcsK MsEIIyrIZlLGNc1bv/KVHCTwNr7qBlyNw26mY=
In-reply-to: <55b258c20812181040k729fc673n59c876134f59226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <BAY126-W4566172F9ECAB7DCF6970C85F30@xxxxxxx> <0EE251BC-8D76-4D10-8B79-0BE04A159C1D@xxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20812181023w203c412dn9a2e6654adef6ede@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650812181036x8689bdex51f7600a6deaa824@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20812181040k729fc673n59c876134f59226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Is that intended as a claim of inconsistency? If so, nttpf. If not
> (either
> > way really), good point bringing up C. 129.
>
> I can't make one, being the Supplicant.


oh, true
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 170
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 170
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 170
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 170
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Priest Assignment 171
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 170
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 170
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread