Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:37:59 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 170


On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Elliott Hird <
penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> On 18 Dec 2008, at 17:30, James Baxter wrote:
>
>  I answer YES to this consultation as the answers to consultations must be
>> in keeping with previous consultations or they will be declared incosistent
>> and become invalid, thus making all consultations that do not follow
>> previous precedent untrue.
>>
>
> INCONSISTENT; misses the point.


UNBELIEVER; no effect.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss