|
Craig Daniel on Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:26:00 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] Proto: A Proper Legal History
|
- To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] Proto: A Proper Legal History
- From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:25:52 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=zXQUirlLcRV47gvhT1ktOIOdY4aTnYf3mToysqFlqfM=; b=O5CEeBp4Lw5KV0rHyk0niolVTgjaJYB5qmsAiM54g7eVmDrcJfkeecay8ARUWSWDYu Sy7IAOJzQtHq+Npp2UHzdioXi0zHTYrefgmMFOCQRvetSzI/38c4rNp7ySRD/oQ+AQT/ EY2JVeVXsSpFkJufdeQcF0jxDg2hj/bL2RwSI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ekf7WsVU7uMGpVnAOv7kDZMT+NO3ePWUodnCrmY8qbDhuqo5Tms0MBdDuTnp+b0hnW wvp8E4mROE+EGQTsauPtVmX0cbKLDmZaVnvWuW35I1hT5yyEGYgOkR4S1bvrAfLzzWWY qd7RLLT80eU8tENtpH2GU+tjFQ0qSf3/blNFQ=
- In-reply-to: <44e5a2650812171423s35b93570n51c0953934700ac3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <44e5a2650812171423s35b93570n51c0953934700ac3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I started writing up a proposal that was a bit different, but then had this
> idea. Please read the below and tell me if it makes sense/suggest things. I
> will finish writing up the final version in <2 hours, because it's currently
> either nday 7 or 8, and I don't want my Proposal texts to be in an uncertain
> quantum state depending on whether they were revised on nday 8 or after the
> voting period already started (i.e. failed).
>
><snip details>
>
> Sound good?
Hell yes.
While I think Consultations are currently influential, at least
properly, I don't think the redundancy of making it explicit or the
addition of a way to decide something we let be Consistent is anything
other than a good idea.
- teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss