| Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:57:34 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: The Oracle is Wise |
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Elliott Hird < penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 16 Dec 2008, at 03:25, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > > I revise my Proposal entitled "The Oracle is Wise and Trustworthy" to >> read: >> > > "It must be random except when it's not and when it isn't that's illegal" Nope. Read it carefully. It never even mentions randomness. It gives the MoQ authority to assign Consultations to whomever he wants (if they are ordained). I personally would do much of that randomly, but that is not in the proposal. What the revised version DOES do is criminalize assigning consultations for personal gain. So, for example, if ehird and I scammed something together, and I then named ehird as priest (without having made a random roll, hence the word "deliberately"), that would be a punishable offense. If in another situation I had the choice between two eligible priests, one of which was overburdened, inexperienced, and de facto inactive, and I chose the other, that would not be a punishable offense. Just a wise decision. BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss