Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Consistent mack spending (revised)

Ed Murphy on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:57:51 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Consistent mack spending (revised)

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Consistent mack spending (revised)
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:55:46 -0800
In-reply-to: <50b58cbd0812151427hf64b76cq6f70286ce4c1cef5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4946D82B.2080800@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <50b58cbd0812151427hf64b76cq6f70286ce4c1cef5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081105 Thunderbird/2.0.0.18 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Sgeo wrote:

> It almost implies that when you say to spend stuff, you have to
> specify it as literally "5 units of currency" or whatever.., but tht
> might be just me.

Hence the use of "text to the effect of", i.e. obvious synonyms are
also covered.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Consistent mack spending (revised)
  - From: Sgeo

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Bribery
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Consistent mack spending (revised)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Empirical
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread