|
Elliott Hird on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:06:37 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ Report - Consultations 155-160 Priest Assignments
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ Report - Consultations 155-160 Priest Assignments
- From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:06:31 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; bh=44wdf1BgF1W9o5OMvFnPCpEyqy4nFxEBlWUFqz1/yE0=; b=AUn3EQV8QV37i/3dvxZRkRF2Q8iurof7ynkVfFYFDYQpJJaoimzvv807sBAJOZ71r8 I82Zb10zYjrXca9EkYkaBvMXVA6SEjifXIUpL+t5i19yZ1YCP9fyt/hMZzoMPAtvGwR0 KyohMIaVR9QNTBCbhPJQ3gzjKzJO9KY59ob6c=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=CUWBX5bjXepFNXpBUnXlp9MIfeaezQKcKqnJ8COMaU92byGfeaXvBizr1NGk+tXPB5 I+zPgjSgup/B1ODnnkQCQkvgEaqS1Zea/I9Lc4vkGmKxJc9EIf7TyS1tjpzSUzPq8C6i suyVyr5L65ahqKlXw6Su5yQeYldjlrcPbmgy4=
- In-reply-to: <1229363759.8188.144.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <44e5a2650812131627o4b9f27amdee65604276e22f4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ACA10DFB-A0C4-4CE5-A807-48AB96BA5DD1@xxxxxxxxx> <1229363759.8188.144.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 15 Dec 2008, at 17:55, Alex Smith wrote:
Actually, if it works, it is a paradox; but I think it's a YES, by
chance. (Note the end of the rule in question saying that doing so is
not a violation of the rules.)
Agh. That defeats clock pragmatization. Who wants to fix it?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss