Warrigal on Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:37:14 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Impeachment and Recall
|
- To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Impeachment and Recall
- From: Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:37:08 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=2MS+X0BDEv7z5yKIMq1Uati98NosXT6D4jbDx2ePi2Q=; b=U9plZr7OFs6zTGBpCS0UDrslupS0CymkngtoOXLUtz/8SD+o3tDzIHoWMxWtBrjrXL yFh2hlc5iUM+dP/dKpu/nkb+nn64562QlK2Ufq9ublr9yptK05EGY2CZR8IjQsvI/jO/ b9LXVc8dwl3iYq0jGsv+R0uO5Z1Kr8NG1XOZo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=GhSEmM6E6wZDJEG9eF2zxqDjUl/S+jXpcaS0PBCU67ks9lMCbGjO5vRXZ/ch30Pdf9 DxRvYxHMrE3QgA2FLqPW3zvumhTU9lNEx8RBRchJ+oBRihgccPqHmPsSNkInPtdxvAX/ HT8FSrbzrJA8ijYQacPUm+Iqi4fs89Dt0SpzM=
- In-reply-to: <2CC6248C-B626-40E9-B316-76CD6CAE6187@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <44e5a2650812141007g2f6bb91ewdfa7188578054a28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2CC6248C-B626-40E9-B316-76CD6CAE6187@xxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "with more Supporters than Objections" doesn't actually work as far as I
> can tell. Try "with 1 support and without N objections, where N is
> the number
> of supporters". (Yes, that's hacky, but it actually works. I think.)
"with more Supporters than Objections" is unambiguous, as far as I can tell.
--Warrigal
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss