Re: [s-d] Thoughts on our Lamentable State

Ed Murphy on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:25:59 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Thoughts on our Lamentable State

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Thoughts on our Lamentable State
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:23:59 -0800
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0812111431i7f10a7dcyd1ac338f64f6f710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <dbedf4da0812111431i7f10a7dcyd1ac338f64f6f710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081105 Thunderbird/2.0.0.18 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Tyler wrote:

> I suggest a higher paranoia threshhold. Perhaps one that grows as
> the society does would be more effective long term.

Suggestion:  Add a third state; an emergency exists only while the
number of Paranoid PEPs exceeds the number of PEPs in this third
state by at least 4.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] Thoughts on our Lamentable State
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Thoughts on our Lamentable State
Next by Date: [s-d] ERIS would be proud that we have had five emergencies in one nday
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Thoughts on our Lamentable State
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Being annoying
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread