Tyler on Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:41:46 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Era 4 History |
Yeah, I remember that. Someone got a proposal through that did everything on a certain webpage, which webpage said "Repeal Rule 13" or something to that effect. I think the page is still linked by someone's Player page, (can't remember who,) if you want to look it up. On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx > >wrote: > > > all the sock stuff too. i'll surely think of more in my sleep. > > > The Rule 4E13 ("there is no Rule 4E13") would be worth mentioning as well. > It later became something along the lines of "there is a Rule 4E13, but any > message to a Public Forum which mentions or alludes to Rule 4E13 is treated > as if it had never reached the Public Forum". It was eventually repealed, > but I can't quite remember how. I think perhaps we did something like > repeal > all rules in the range of 12 to 14? Or maybe adopted a new ruleset by > proposal that was identical in all respects save for 13's absence? > > BP > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss