Re: [s-d] Era_Start

["Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>]

2008/12/3, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On 04/12/2008, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > ehird, why do ERA_START and REAL_START reference nday 153-1? Do you want
> > future historians to think the fifth era started (almost) a week later
> than
> > it did?
> >
>
> Err, my RP doesn't say that.


http://b.nomic.net/index.php/User:Ehird/Make_it_Better


In rule 5E17, replace "ERA_START" with "nweek N", where N is *the number of
the first nweek that will start after this proposal passes*. (i.e. the next
nweek)

In rule 5E17, replace "PROPOSAL" with a link to this Refresh Proposal's page
on the wiki.

At *the start of next nweek*, in rule 5E17, replace "REAL_START" with the
current real world date in "DD MONTH YYYY" form, where MONTH is the full
name of the month.

(emphasis mine)
Am I reading it wrong?

> --
> Charles Schaefer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss