Re: [s-d] Era

Elliott Hird on Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:17:14 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Era_Start

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Era_Start
From: "Elliott Hird" <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 01:16:50 +0000
In-reply-to: <285c99840812031701v236d8935g65d82ab4c2e104e2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <285c99840812031701v236d8935g65d82ab4c2e104e2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 04/12/2008, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ehird, why do ERA_START and REAL_START reference nday 153-1? Do you want
> future historians to think the fifth era started (almost) a week later than
> it did?
>
> --
> Charles Schaefer
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>

Err, my RP doesn't say that.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] Era_Start
  - From: Charles Schaefer

References:
- [s-d] Era_Start
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] DIS: Some fascinating, live, real-world nomic
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Era_Start
Previous by thread: [s-d] Era_Start
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Era_Start
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread