Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1

Elliott Hird on Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:49:50 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 22:49:39 +0000
In-reply-to: <49370BE1.9070506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <49370BE1.9070506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 3 Dec 2008, at 22:44, Jay Campbell wrote:

> I encourage an Answer at least as interesting as Paradox.

The rule change itself didn't cause that to happen; it was indirect.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1
  - From: Jay Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tweaky Tweak
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Regarding era-nomenclature controversies
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread