Re: [s-d] Eras

Elliott Hird on Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:18:56 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Eras

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Eras
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 17:14:13 +0000
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650812030905t78c5e001g9c2ce37fd1e40aed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650812030905t78c5e001g9c2ce37fd1e40aed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 3 Dec 2008, at 17:05, Jamie Dallaire wrote:

> According to the current ruleset:
>
> Era #       Length (nweeks)
>    1                  84
>    2                  27
>    3                  23
>    4                  17
>
> Can we buck the trend?
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Yes. Also, note that in real time, 3 was the shortest.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] Eras
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] k then
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tweaky Tweak
Previous by thread: [s-d] Eras
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] factoring the Eras
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread