Re: [s-d] [s-b] k then

Elliott Hird on Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:18:40 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] k then

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] k then
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 17:13:59 +0000
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650812030850l5c9ac541q690ae353279c56ef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <9329B5BA-BAFF-4252-AE5B-EAC2740C4C85@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650812030850l5c9ac541q690ae353279c56ef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 3 Dec 2008, at 16:50, Jamie Dallaire wrote:

> grammar.

Eh, it's the simplest way of writing it.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] k then
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] k then
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Eras
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] k then
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] k then
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread