Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era

Ed Murphy on Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:20:04 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:18:15 -0800
In-reply-to: <653283240812030622k48cf3a09sdff17a76c0c4759c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6bf32280812030608p7cb16504h6226725d6addf490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <B6C9254E-108B-497B-A0A7-1F5EEBE7973D@xxxxxxxxx> <653283240812030622k48cf3a09sdff17a76c0c4759c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081105 Thunderbird/2.0.0.18 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Wooble wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Just two emergencies in a nweek was enough to start era 4.
> 
> Proto: rename 3rd Era to Early 3rd Era, 4th to Mid 3rd Era, 5th to
> Late 3rd Era, C Nomic to 4th Era.

"C Nomic" should be reserved for a codenomic.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tweak
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread