Elliott Hird on Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:12:22 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: This isn't the fifth era |
On 3 Dec 2008, at 14:08, comex wrote: > I like the changes brought by ehird's RP, and they're large in scope, > but not as large as the scope of previous new eras, at least one of > which involved a complete Rule reset. As it is, nearly all our Rules > are identical to the 4E versions. I don't think this should be > considered the fifth era-- save that for something more important. > Instead, I propose calling our current Era the Late Fourth Era, > numbered 4.1. The Fourth Era of B Nomic is the time starting with nweek 135 (10 Dec 2007, prompted by a second State of Emergency in 2 nweeks), and ending immediately before the start of The Fifth Era of B Nomic. Just two emergencies in a nweek was enough to start era 4. I think the chance in attitude is important - the rules have a distinctly different feel now. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss