Charles Schaefer on Wed, 3 Dec 2008 01:31:12 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] MathNauts? 

2008/12/3, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> By formal, I meant enforceable in B Nomic courts. The MathNaut rules would
> still have to be written and agreed upon. I guess the way I use the word,
> we
> almost are playing B without formal rules. ;)


I'm willing to play (MathNauts) with (or without) any set of rules you all
want. My suggestions were just to get the ball rolling.

Well, maybe not ANY set of rules. It would be hard to play MathNauts using,
for example, the United States Code.

-- 
> Charles Schaefer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss