Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 2 Dec 2008 03:46:42 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] squares |
yay, so I finally read ehird's RP really carefully front to back. a) whither the temporal prime directive? don't think it matters in the proposed ruleset, but it's just a good idea to keep its absence in mind. b) proposal conflicts are a little bit broken. if a proposal conflicts with another that is won, then the first is automatically lost. if two conflicting proposals are won, I think the one with the highest strength should prevail, but this is not currently the case. I'll propose this if ehird's RP passes. c) "Initially, all Players are Resident in the Square (0,0). [...] A Square can never have more than 3 Residents." What??? d) I quite like this refresh proposal. Here, let me go vote for it for real. Billy Pilgrim _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss