| Charles Schaefer on Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:58:14 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Contract Ideals Discussion |
2008/11/28, Jamie Dallaire bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx: > > > That said, to make contract law an interesting and appealing mechanism that > players will WANT to get involved in, it does need to have a certain degree > of protection from being manipulated by non-party majorities. Whether that > protection is just unwritten sportsmanship or whether it's codified into B > law, we'll have to see. How about players agree to a contract prohibiting them from voting for proposals that interfere with other players' contracts? It seems like it could work if it was phrased properly and enough players joined. Is there some blatant loophole I'm missing? -- > Charles Schaefer _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss