Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal: Referendum

["Elliott Hird" <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 28/11/2008, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Jamie Dallaire
> <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So here's the closest thing. Any Refresh Proposals that you dislike more
>> than the status quo should be ranked below mine.
>>
>> I submit the following Refresh Proposal:
>> {
>> All Paranoid PEPs become Calm.
>> }
>
> I was going to propose that, but I changed my mind.  Even Tweaks
> require ndays, and thus the Clock: going directly back to the old
> state just requires another emergency (unless you do an Oracularity,
> but good luck getting that to go through).
>
> Therefore I now support Murphy's proposal: ehird's is okay, but in the
> half that I read, it had a few mistakes (and e asked me to fix one of
> them :p)... I might vote for eirs if e looks very thoroughly through
> it.
>

I assure you I have. Think of the bigger picture!

Btw it was that manual approving doesn't work due to conflict auto
worked. Fix tomorrow.

_______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss