Elliott Hird on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:21:03 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] About ranked pairs... |
On 27 Nov 2008, at 07:24, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > I think some people are voting here as if this were IRV. > > Recommend checking out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ > Ranked_pairs#Procedure, > particularly the following passage: "Voters may also express > indifference > (e.g., A = B), and unstated candidates are assumed to be equally > worse than > the stated candidates." > > I'm assuming that the people voting for a single RP really mean: {A > > B = C > = D} rather than: {A = B = C =D}.... > > Same goes for any ballot with unlisted RPs... Which, given Wooble's > point > about old ones, is all of them. > > Billy Pilgrim Oh. Not that we can do anything. We get 1 ballot only. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss