Elliott Hird on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:21:03 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] About ranked pairs...


On 27 Nov 2008, at 07:24, Jamie Dallaire wrote:

> I think some people are voting here as if this were IRV.
>
> Recommend checking out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ 
> Ranked_pairs#Procedure,
> particularly the following passage: "Voters may also express  
> indifference
> (e.g., A = B), and unstated candidates are assumed to be equally  
> worse than
> the stated candidates."
>
> I'm assuming that the people voting for a single RP really mean: {A  
> > B = C
> = D} rather than: {A = B = C =D}....
>
> Same goes for any ballot with unlisted RPs... Which, given Wooble's  
> point
> about old ones, is all of them.
>
> Billy Pilgrim

Oh. Not that we can do anything. We get 1 ballot only.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss